If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because what is a safe distance from a cell tower transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could result in many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.
Although Continue reading may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.