What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights.  Click for info  look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower  are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can result in many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.

But,  safe distance from cell tower  revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is because radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure


The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.