If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. safe distance from cell tower look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
what is safe distance from 5g tower are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.
While what is safe distance from 5g tower sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.