Very best safest distance from the 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from the 5G cell System?

If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas.  faraday hats  could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.


Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts.  faraday cage hats  would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For  Continue reading , co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.