If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.
Although safe distance from cell tower may sound like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For safe distance from cell tower , a 2014 study in India discovered that those living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.
But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.