If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. https://swimlily08.bravejournal.net/post/2023/03/30/Is-5g-unhealthy-to-suit-your-needs look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. what is safe distance from 5g tower could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
While it sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.
This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.