Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower  of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds



The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to many potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the farther the tower is.

While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore,  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.